Physician awareness and understanding of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in Japan: a web-based study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate potential knowledge gaps between neurologists and non-specialists and identify challenges in the current management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), with a focus on 'early diagnosis' and 'appropriate treatment' for CIDP. DESIGN: A non-interventional, cross-sectional, web-based quantitative survey of physicians working in healthcare clinics or hospitals in Japan. SETTING: Participants were recruited from the Nikkei Business Publications panel from 18 August to 14 September 2022. PARTICIPANTS: Responses from 360 physicians (120 each of internists, orthopaedists and neurologists) were collected. OUTCOME MEASURES: Responses relating to a CIDP hypothetical case and current understanding were assessed to determine awareness, collaboration preferences and diagnosis and treatment decisions. RESULTS: Understanding of CIDP was 90.8% among neurologists, 10.8% among orthopaedists and 13.3% among internists; >80% of orthopaedists and internists answered that neurologists are preferable for treatment. Diagnostic assessment using a hypothetical case showed 95.0% of neurologists, 74.2% of orthopaedists and 72.5% of internists suspected CIDP. Among orthopaedists and internists suspecting CIDP, >70% considered referring to neurology, while ~10% considered continuing treatment without a referral. Among neurologists, 69.4% chose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) as first-line treatment and determined effectiveness to be ≤3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Orthopaedists and internists had lower CIDP awareness compared with neurologists, which may lead to inadequate referrals to neurology. Evaluation of IVIg effectiveness for maintenance therapy occurred earlier than the guideline recommendations (6-12 months), risking premature discontinuation. Improving CIDP knowledge among orthopaedists and internists is critical for better diagnosis and collaboration with neurologists. Neurologists should consider slow and careful evaluation of IVIg maintenance therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000048516.

Anti-MAG neuropathy: historical aspects, clinical-pathological correlations, and considerations for future therapeutical trials.

BACKGROUND: Patients with anti-MAG neuropathy present with distal demyelinating polyneuropathy, IgM monoclonal gammopathy, and elevated titers of anti-MAG antibodies. OBJECTIVE: This paper reviews what is known about the clinical presentation, course, pathophysiology, and treatment of anti-MAG neuropathy, with considerations for the design of therapeutic trials. METHODS: A literature review of the medical and scientific literature related to anti-MAG neuropathy, and the design of therapeutic clinical trials in peripheral neuropathy. RESULTS: Anti-MAG neuropathy can remain indolent for many years but then enter a progressive phase. Highly elevated antibody titers are diagnostic, but intermediate titers can also occur in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). The peripheral nerves can become inexcitable, thereby masking the demyelinating abnormalities. There is good evidence that the anti-MAG antibodies cause neuropathy. Reduction of the autoantibody concentration by agents that target B-cells was reported to result in clinical improvement in case series and uncontrolled trials, but not in controlled clinical trials, probably due to inadequate trial design. CONCLUSION: We propose that therapeutic trials for anti-MAG neuropathy include patients with the typical presentation, some degree of weakness, highly elevated anti-MAG antibody titers, and at least one nerve exhibiting demyelinating range abnormalities. Treatment with one or a combination of anti-B-cell agents would aim at reducing the autoantibody concentration by at least 60%. A trial duration of 2 years may be required to show efficacy. The neuropathy impairment score of the lower extremities (NIS-LL) plus the Lower Limb Function (LLF) score would be a suitable primary outcome measure.

ANTECEDENTES: Pacientes com neuropatia anti-MAG apresentam polineuropatia desmielinizante distal, gamopatia monoclonal IgM e títulos elevados de anticorpos anti-MAG. OBJETIVO: Este artigo revisa o que se sabe sobre a apresentação clínica, curso, fisiopatologia e tratamento da neuropatia anti-MAG, com considerações para o desenho de ensaios terapêuticos. MéTODOS: Revisão bibliográfica da literatura médica e científica relacionada à neuropatia anti-MAG e desenho de ensaios clínicos terapêuticos em neuropatia periférica. RESULTADOS: A neuropatia anti-MAG pode permanecer indolente durante muitos anos, mas depois entra numa fase progressiva. Títulos de anticorpos altamente elevados são diagnósticos, mas títulos intermediários também podem ocorrer na polineuropatia desmielinizante inflamatória crônica (CIDP). Os nervos periféricos podem tornar-se inexcitáveis, mascarando, assim, as anomalias desmielinizantes. Há boas evidências de que os anticorpos anti-MAG causam a neuropatia. Foi relatado que a redução da concentração de autoanticorpos por agentes direcionados às células B resultou em melhora clínica em séries de casos e ensaios não controlados, mas não em ensaios clínicos controlados, provavelmente devido ao desenho inadequado dos ensaios. CONCLUSãO: Propomos que os ensaios terapêuticos para neuropatia anti-MAG incluam pacientes com apresentação típica, algum grau de fraqueza, títulos de anticorpos anti-MAG altamente elevados e pelo menos um nervo exibindo anormalidades na faixa desmielinizante. O tratamento com um ou uma combinação de agentes anticélulas B teria como objetivo reduzir a concentração de autoanticorpos em pelo menos 60%. Pode ser necessária uma duração de ensaio de 2 anos para demonstrar eficácia. A pontuação de comprometimento da neuropatia das extremidades inferiores (NIS-LL) mais a pontuação da função dos membros inferiores (LLF) seria uma medida de resultado primário adequada.

Prevalence, Clinical Profiles, and Prognosis of CIDP in Japanese Nationwide Survey: Analyses of 1,257 Diagnosis-Confirmed Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the current epidemiology, clinical profile, and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) using a nationwide survey in Japan. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide survey using an epidemiologic method established in 2021. Questionnaire sheets were sent to the hospital departments of neurology and pediatric neurology throughout Japan. A primary questionnaire was used to determine the number of patients and their prevalence, and a second questionnaire was used to collect detailed clinical information. RESULTS: The primary survey showed that the estimated number of patients with CIDP was 4,180, with a prevalence of 3.3 per 100,000 persons. In the secondary survey, detailed clinical data were available for 1,257 patients. The male-to-female ratio was 1.5:1, and the median age at onset was 52 years. Typical CIDP was the most frequent subtype (52%), followed by distal (17%) and multifocal/focal CIDP (17%). Initial treatments included immunoglobulin therapy (72%), corticosteroids (15%), and others (13%). Among patients with CIDP, 78% had a progressive/relapsing course, 14% did not respond to first-line treatments, and 18% could not walk independently at the last visit. Among the subtypes, typical CIDP had the most severe disability before treatment (44% of patients could not walk independently). However, they showed a more favorable response to treatment than those with distal or multifocal CIDP. In the subgroup analyses, logistic regression analyses showed that younger age at onset, no muscle atrophy, and abnormal median-normal sural sensory nerve responses were associated with a higher probability of independent walking. DISCUSSION: Our study represents the largest cohort study on CIDP to demonstrate the current epidemiologic and clinical status of CIDP in Japan. Clinical subtypes seem to be associated with different treatment responses and outcomes; therefore, an appropriate treatment strategy according to the pathophysiology of each subtype is required to improve the prognosis of CIDP.

Neuromuscular ultrasound in combination with nerve conduction studies helps identify inflammatory motor neuropathies from lower motor neuron syndromes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Identifying patients with inflammatory motor neuropathies (IMNs) is warranted since effective treatments are available and the prognosis of these patients differs from that of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. METHODS: Between January 2019 and May 2022, 102 consecutive treatment-naïve lower motor neuron syndrome (LMNS) patients were recruited; these patients were suspected of having multifocal motor neuropathy, pure motor chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with initial lower motor neuron presentation. Neuromuscular ultrasound (US) and nerve conduction studies (NCSs) were conducted at baseline. Relevant diagnostic investigations were performed if clinically warranted. The proposed US evidence of IMN was as follows: (i) nerve enlargement at ≥1 of the predetermined sites or (ii) absence of high intensity fasciculations in predefined muscle groups. Final diagnoses were made by experienced physicians after a prolonged follow-up period (≥12 months). IMN patients were defined as LMNS patients who experienced convincing improvements in response to immunotherapies. IMN patients without electrodiagnostic demyelinating features were diagnosed with treatment-responsive LMNS (TR-LMNS). RESULTS: In total, 16 patients were classified as IMN, including nine chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy/multifocal motor neuropathy patients and seven TR-LMNS patients. Six TR-LMNS patients were identified by neuromuscular US. The sensitivity and specificity of NCSs, nerve US and muscle US were 56.3% and 100%, 43.8% and 90.7% and 68.8% and 97.7%, respectively. When these three modalities were combined, the sensitivity and specificity were 93.8% and 88.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Neuromuscular US studies are supplementary modalities to NCSs, and the combined use of these techniques might improve the identification of IMNs in LMNS patients.

Successful autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a refractory anti-Caspr1 antibody nodopathy.

AIM: Autoimmune nodopathies have specific clinicopathologic features, antibodies directed against nodal proteins (neurofascin 186) or paranodal proteins (neurofascin 155, contactin 1, contactin-associated protein 1 (Caspr1)), and usually have a poor response to first-line therapies for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Anti-Caspr1 nodopathy treated with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has not been previously reported. METHODS: We report the first case of an anti-Caspr1 antibody-positive nodopathy refractory to high-intensity immunosuppressive treatment, including rituximab, that responded dramatically to AHSCT. RESULTS: A 53-year-old woman presented with a rapidly progressive generalized ataxic, painful motor, and inflammatory neuropathy supported by neurophysiologic and MRI studies. Initial tests for antibodies to nodal/paranodal proteins were negative. She was treated with multiple courses of intravenous immunoglobulin and methylprednisolone, plasma exchange, rituximab, and cyclophosphamide without significant clinical benefit. Repeated testing for antibodies to nodal/paranodal proteins yielded a positive result for anti-Caspr1/IgG4 isotype antibodies. Given the poor response to multiple high intensity treatments and the relatively young age of the patient, we decided to perform AHSCT at 30 months post-onset. Immediately after AHSCT, she stopped all immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapy. The Overall Neuropathy Limitation Score improved from 8/12 to 4/12 at 6 months post-AHSCT. At 3 months post-AHSCT, IgG4 against Caspr1 was negative and no reactivity against paranodes could be detected. CONCLUSION: We report a particularly severe anti-Caspr1 antibody autoimmune nodopathy that responded dramatically to AHSCT. Although the rarity of the disease limits the possibility of larger studies, AHSCT may be a valuable therapy in treatment-refractory cases.

Chronic Immune-Mediated Demyelinating Neuropathies.

OBJECTIVE: This article is an overview of chronic demyelinating neuropathies and highlights the phenotypic categorization, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic immune-mediated neuropathies. The clinical and diagnostic characteristics of other chronic demyelinating neuropathies that are common mimics of immune-mediated neuropathies are also discussed. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS: The underlying pathophysiology of chronic demyelinating neuropathies is heterogeneous, and components of both humoral and cellular immune responses are thought to play a role in the immune-mediated types of chronic demyelinating neuropathy. The role of the humoral response is highlighted with a specific focus on the relatively recent discovery of antibody-mediated antinodal and paranodal demyelinating neuropathies. Additionally, new diagnostic criteria for some of the chronic demyelinating neuropathies, as well as ways to differentiate chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy from other chronic demyelinating polyneuropathies, are discussed. ESSENTIAL POINTS: Chronic demyelinating neuropathies can present with overlapping clinical characteristics with seemingly subtle variations. It is clinically important to differentiate these types of neuropathies because the treatment and management can vary and affect prognosis.

Time for a standardized diagnostic response test in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy?

Standardized pharmacological response tests are important and established diagnostic tools in the field of neurology. However, regarding therapeutic responses to intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) in CIDP, neither a definition of therapeutic response has been established, nor a response test has been suggested so far. Here we suggest a practical clinical approach which is supported by current literature in the field. An established standardized IVIg response test could avoid prolonged therapy without benefit for the patient and ensure a timely therapy switch or treatment escalation if required. This approach would also be advantageous due to the global scarcity of plasma derivatives as a human resource and could be the foundation to be adjusted and improved by subsequent studies.

Combined central and peripheral demyelination - one-year follow-up of patient with co-incidence of multiple sclerosis and multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy - A Case Report.

Combined central and peripheral demyelination (CCPD) is a rare autoimmune neurologic disease, characterized by immune-mediated damage of myelin sheath at central and peripheral levels of the nervous system. The current knowledge about this disorder is only limited, mainly due to the low incidence of the disease. According to previous studies, CCPD has a very heterogeneous course, insufficient therapeutic response, and an unfavorable prognosis. We report on the 37-year-old patient with a coincidence of demyelinating lesions in the brain fulfilling current McDonald's diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis, as well as the presence of an atypical variant of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) - multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory-motor neuropathy (MADSAM), as a subtype of combined central and peripheral demyelination (CCPD).

Molecular, Electrophysiological, and Ultrasonographic Differences in Selected Immune-Mediated Neuropathies with Therapeutic Implications.

The spectrum of immune-mediated neuropathies is broad and the different subtypes are still being researched. With the numerous subtypes of immune-mediated neuropathies, establishing the appropriate diagnosis in normal clinical practice is challenging. The treatment of these disorders is also troublesome. The authors have undertaken a literature review of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). The molecular, electrophysiological and ultrasound features of these autoimmune polyneuropathies are analyzed, highlighting the differences in diagnosis and ultimately treatment. The immune dysfunction can lead to damage to the peripheral nervous system. In practice, it is suspected that these disorders are caused by autoimmunity to proteins located in the node of Ranvier or myelin components of peripheral nerves, although disease-associated autoantibodies have not been identified for all disorders. The electrophysiological presence of conduction blocks is another important factor characterizing separate subgroups of treatment-naive motor neuropathies, including multifocal CIDP (synonyms: multifocal demyelinating neuropathy with persistent conduction block), which differs from multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block (MMN) in both responses to treatment modalities and electrophysiological features. Ultrasound is a reliable method for diagnosing immune-mediated neuropathies, particularly when alternative diagnostic examinations yield inconclusive results. In overall terms, the management of these disorders includes immunotherapy such as corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchange. Improvements in clinical criteria and the development of more disease-specific immunotherapies should expand the therapeutic possibilities for these debilitating diseases.

Effectiveness and safety of rituximab in autoimmune nodopathy: a single-center cohort study.

Autoimmune nodopathy is a peripheral neuropathy characterized by acquired motor and sensory deficit with autoantibodies against the node of Ranvier or paranodal region in the peripheral nervous system. The clinical and pathological characteristics of the disease are distinct from that of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), and the standard treatment for CIDP is partially effective. Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody which binds and depletes B cells in peripheral blood. This prospective observational study included 19 patients with autoimmune nodopathy. Participants received intravenous rituximab treatment 100 mg the first day and 500 mg the next day and given every 6 months. The Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score, Inflammatory Rasch-Built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS), Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score, and Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) were collected at entry and before the rituximab infusion every 6 months. At the last visit, 94.7% (18/19) of the patients showed clinical improvement on either the INCAT, I-RODS, MRC, or NIS scale. After the first infusion, 9 patients (47.7%) showed improvement on the INCAT score, and 11 patients (57.9%) on cI-RODS. In patients who received more than one rituximab infusion, the improvement of INCAT score and cI-RODS at the last assessment was higher than that after the first infusion. We also observed tapered or withdrawn concomitant oral medications in these patients.

Pediatric-Onset Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical features, demographic features, and treatment modalities of pediatric-onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) in Turkey. METHODS: The clinical data of patients between January 2010 and December 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were evaluated according to the Joint Task Force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on the management of CIDP (2021). In addition, patients with typical CIDP were divided into two groups according to the first-line treatment modalities (group 1: IVIg only, group 2: IVIg + steroid). The patients were further divided into two separate groups based on their magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients, 22 (51.2%) males and 21 (48.8%) females, were included in the study. There was a significant difference between pretreatment and post-treatment modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores (P < 0.05) of all patients. First-line treatments include intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) (n = 19, 44.2%), IVIg + steroids (n = 20, 46.5%), steroids (n = 1, 2.3%), IVIg + steroids + plasmapheresis (n = 1, 2.3%), and IVIg + plasmapheresis (n = 1, 2.3%). Alternative agent therapy consisted of azathioprine (n = 5), rituximab (n = 1), and azathioprine + mycophenolate mofetil + methotrexate (n = 1). There was no difference between the pretreatment and post-treatment mRS scores of groups 1 and 2 (P > 0.05); however, a significant decrease was found in the mRS scores of both groups with treatment (P < 0.05). The patients with abnormal MRI had significantly higher pretreatment mRS scores compared with the group with normal MRI (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study demonstrated that first-line immunotherapy modalities (IVIg vs IVIg + steroids) had equal efficacy for the treatment of patients with CIDP. We also determined that MRI features might be associated with profound clinical features, but did not affect treatment response.

Chronic inflammatory neuropathies and their impact on activities and participation.

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) are inflammatory neuropathies that can lead to considerable limitations in daily activities and in social participation. However, systematic evaluation of these self-reported limitations is lacking in the currently available studies. Understanding the impact of these diagnoses on patients' life is important to optimize management strategies. AIM: To systematically assess the self-reported limitations in activities and participation and determine associated factors. METHODS: A survey study was conducted in 2021 in a cohort of patients with CIDP (n = 257) and MMN (n = 148) from a university hospital. The survey included the Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale and the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation, questions addressing personal and disease-related factors and treatment. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to determine associations with disease-related and personal factors. RESULTS: A total of 147 CIDP and 103 MMN patients responded. Limitations in activities were reported by 70.7% CIDP and 52.2% MMN patients with moderate to severe limitations in 22.4% and 5.9% patients, respectively. Participation restrictions were reported by 50% of CIDP and 40% of MMN patients, nevertheless satisfaction with participation was high. Fatigue, pain and resilience were independently associated with limitations in activities and satisfaction with participation in CIDP patients. CONCLUSIONS: Activity limitations and restrictions in participation are common in CIDP patients and to a lesser extent in MMN patients. Fatigue, pain and resilience independently contributed to perceived limitations in CIDP patients. Referral to a rehabilitation physician is warranted to address these limitations appropriately.

Current clinical management of CIDP with immunoglobulins in France: An expert opinion.

Treatment strategies in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) must be adapted on a case-to-case basis. Validated and reproducible tools for monitoring treatment response are required at diagnosis, when initiating treatment and throughout follow-up. A task force of French neurologists, experts in neuromuscular disease reference centers, was assembled to provide expert advice on the management of typical CIDP with intravenous immunoglobulins (Ig), and to harmonize treatment practices in public and private hospitals. The task force also referred to the practical experience of treating CIDP with Ig at the diagnostic, induction and follow-up stages, including the assessment and management of Ig dependence, and following the recommendations of the French health agency.

Clinical and pathophysiological implications of autoantibodies in autoimmune neuropathies.

Autoimmune neuropathies are a heterogeneous group of rare and disabling diseases in which the immune system targets peripheral nervous system antigens and that respond to immune therapies. This review focuses on Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy, polyneuropathy associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy, and autoimmune nodopathies. Autoantibodies targeting gangliosides, proteins in the node of Ranvier, and myelin-associated glycoprotein have been described in these disorders, defining subgroups of patients with similar clinical features and response to therapy. This topical review describes the role of these autoantibodies in the pathogenesis of autoimmune neuropathies and their clinical and therapeutic importance.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Diagnostic problems in clinical practice in Serbia.

Making diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is challenging since it can mimic a multitude of disorders, and is misdiagnosed in at least 50% of cases. We sought to determine the frequency of CIDP misdiagnosis in clinical practice in Serbia, to uncover CIDP mimics, and to identify factors that may aid in CIDP diagnosis. Our longitudinal retrospective cohort study included 86 eligible adult patients referred to the Neurology Clinic, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, with a diagnosis of CIDP. We also included 15 patients referred to us with different diagnoses that ended up having CIDP as their final diagnosis. Exactly half of patients referred as CIDP failed to meet the established diagnostic criteria (non-CIDP) and were given an alternative diagnosis at the first hospitalization. At the 1-year follow-up, the diagnosis was further revised in four subjects. Confirmed CIDP patients usually had their initial diagnosis based on the nerve conduction studies (NCS), a typical presentation with symmetrical involvement of all four limbs, as well as higher frequencies of elevated protein levels and albuminocytologic dissociation in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). CIDP patients also responded better to immune therapy. We found that 52% of the patients initially referred to our Clinic as CIDP were given other diagnoses after a 1-year follow-up. Out of all CIDP cases, 27% had been unrecognized prior to referral to our Center. Utilization of clear and objective indicators - conclusive NCS, improvement on therapy, and elevated CSF proteins may provide greater certainty in diagnosing CIDP.

The gut microbiome in intravenous immunoglobulin-treated chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The gut microbiome is involved in autoimmunity. Data on its composition in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), the most common chronic autoimmune disorder of peripheral nerves, are currently lacking. METHODS: In this monocentric exploratory pilot study, stool samples were prospectively collected from 16 CIDP patients (mean age 58 ± 10 years, 25% female) before and 1 week after administration of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). Gut microbiota were analyzed via bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing and compared to 15 age-matched healthy subjects (mean age 59 ± 15 years, 66% female). RESULTS: The gut microbiota of CIDP patients showed an increased alpha-diversity (p = 0.005) and enrichment of Firmicutes, such as Blautia (p = 0.0004), Eubacterium hallii (p = 0.0004), or Ruminococcus torques (p = 0.03), and of Actinobacteriota (p = 0.03) compared to healthy subjects. IVIg administration did not alter the gut microbiome composition in CIDP in this short-term observation (p = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: The gut microbiome in IVIg-treated CIDP shows distinct features, with increased bacterial diversity and enrichment of short-chain fatty acid producing Firmicutes. IVIg had no short-term impact on the gut microbiome in CIDP patients. As the main limitation of this exploratory pilot study was small cohort size, future studies also including therapy-naïve patients are warranted to verify our findings and to explore the impact of long-term IVIg treatment on the gut microbiome in CIDP.

A diagnostic score for anti-myelin-associated-glycoprotein neuropathy or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in patients with anti-myelin-associated-glycoprotein antibody.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A diagnostic score was developed to discriminate anti-myelin-associated-glycoprotein (MAG) neuropathy from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and applied it to patients with atypical anti-MAG neuropathy. METHODS: The clinical and electrophysiological features of patients with a diagnosis of typical anti-MAG neuropathy were compared to those of patients with a diagnosis of CIDP. The association of each feature with the diagnosis was assessed in the two groups. Features showing a significant association with the diagnosis were included in a multivariable logistic regression model and adjusted odds ratios were estimated for each feature. A score ranging from 1 to 3 was applied to each feature based on the magnitude of the estimated odds ratios. The score was then applied to patients with a clinical diagnosis of CIDP who also had high anti-MAG antibody titers (CIDP-MAG). RESULTS: Thirty-one anti-MAG neuropathy patients, 45 typical CIDP patients and 16 CIDP-MAG patients were included. Scores in anti-MAG antibody patients ranged from 1 to 5 and in CIDP patients from -7 to -1. Using the score, 4/16 CIDP-MAG patients were diagnosed to have anti-MAG neuropathy and 12/16 patients to have CIDP. Response to intravenous immunoglobulin in the CIDP-MAG patients classified as CIDP was similar to that of definite CIDP patients and higher than that of anti-MAG neuropathy patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our score allowed an accurate discrimination to be made, amongst patients with anti-MAG antibodies, of those affected by CIDP and the patients with anti-MAG neuropathy. This score may help proper treatment to be chosen for patients with anti-MAG antibodies with a CIDP-like presentation.

[Public health situation of CIDP patients in nine German centers-neuritis network Germany]. / Versorgungssituation von CIDP-Patienten in neun deutschen Zentren des Neuritis Netzes.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis and treatment of patients with immune-mediated neuropathies is challenging due to the heterogeneity of the diseases. OBJECTIVES: To assess similarities and differences in the current care of patients with immune-mediated polyneuropathies in specialized centers in Germany within the German neuritis network "Neuritis Netz". MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of nine neurological departments in Germany that specialize in the care of patients with immune-mediated neuropathies. We assessed the diagnosis, the approach to diagnostic work-up and follow-up, typical symptoms at manifestation and progression of the disease, and treatment data. RESULTS: This report includes data from 1529 patients per year treated for immune-mediated neuropathies, of whom 1320 suffered from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Diagnostic work-up almost always included nerve conduction studies, electromyography, and lumbar puncture in accordance with current guidelines. The use of ultrasound, biopsy, and MRI varied. The most important clinical parameter for therapy monitoring in all centers was motor function in the clinical follow-up examinations. A wide range of different immunosuppressants was used for maintenance therapy in about 15% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide important epidemiological insights into the care of patients with immune-mediated neuropathies in Germany. The further development of specific recommendations for treatment and follow-up examinations is necessary to ensure a uniform standard of patient care. This effort is greatly facilitated by a structured collaboration between expert centers such as Neuritis Netz.